THE EXAMPLE LIBRARY

See how an answer
is checked.

Start with the guided example. Then explore what changes when policies conflict or a document is missing.

NEW TO SECOND OPINION?

We’ll walk you through your first review.

Policies and an answer are filled in. Just follow the steps.

Authored, synthetic policies Full review workflowsNo account. No AI request.

Exceptions6 claims

The refund that sounded right.

A plausible support answer mixes correct windows, a missed condition, and an invented deadline.

3 supported2 contradicted1 insufficient

Inside this scenario

Inspect the premium exception, the unopened-item requirement, and the payment-security rule. The 48-hour refund promise has no supporting passage.

Conflicts6 claims

Two policies. One impossible promise.

An equally applicable bulletin changes the premium return window. Which document wins?

2 supported2 contradicted1 insufficient1 conflicting

Inside this scenario

The two premium policies specify 30 and 21 days for the same scope and period. Neither establishes precedence. Inspect both sides in the evidence panel.

Evidence gaps6 claims

Take away the exception.

Keep the answer fixed. Remove its premium source. Watch two judgments change.

Same 6 claims2 judgments changed1 source excluded

Inside this scenario

The baseline keeps all three sources. The comparison excludes the premium exception: the remaining general policy contradicts 30 days, while free shipping becomes unsupported.

TAKE THE REVIEWER’S SEAT

Before the model calls it,
what would you say?

Try the evidence challenge

Your workspace travels between these pages. Save a review file to keep a copy after refreshing or clearing.

The refund that sounded right.

A plausible support answer mixes correct windows, a missed condition, and an invented deadline.

3 supported2 contradicted1 insufficient

Inside this scenario

Inspect the premium exception, the unopened-item requirement, and the payment-security rule. The 48-hour refund promise has no supporting passage.

Two policies. One impossible promise.

An equally applicable bulletin changes the premium return window. Which document wins?

2 supported2 contradicted1 insufficient1 conflicting

Inside this scenario

The two premium policies specify 30 and 21 days for the same scope and period. Neither establishes precedence. Inspect both sides in the evidence panel.

Take away the exception.

Keep the answer fixed. Remove its premium source. Watch two judgments change.

Same 6 claims2 judgments changed1 source excluded

Inside this scenario

The baseline keeps all three sources. The comparison excludes the premium exception: the remaining general policy contradicts 30 days, while free shipping becomes unsupported.

See how an answeris checked.

We’ll walk you through your first review.

The refund that sounded right.

Two policies. One impossible promise.

Take away the exception.

Before the model calls it,what would you say?

See how an answeris checked.

We’ll walk you through your first review.

The refund that sounded right.

Two policies. One impossible promise.

Take away the exception.

Before the model calls it,what would you say?

See how an answer
is checked.

Before the model calls it,
what would you say?

See how an answer
is checked.

Before the model calls it,
what would you say?